* W porównaniu z cewnikiem dożylnym bez końcówki dyfuzyjnej.
† W porównaniu z cewnikiem z kopolimeru fluorowego etylenu/propylenu (FEP)
** W porównaniu z cewnikiem B. Braun Introcan Safety® z urządzeniem stabilizującym Bard Statlock® IV Ultra.
Odniesienia
- Gonzalez Lopez J, Arribi Vilela A, Fernandez Del Palacio E, et al. Indwell times, complications and costs of open vs closed safety peripheral intravenous catheters: a randomized study. J Hosp Infect. 2014;86(2):117-126.
- Tamura N, Ave S, Hagimoto K, et al. Unfavorable peripheral intravenous catheter replacements an be reduced using an integrated closed intravenous catheter system. J Vasc Access. 2014;15(4):257-263.)
- Dane z badań własnych firmy BD. BD Protocol 10765 – (67% claim) - 14 czerwca 2011 r.; BD Protocol 12163 – Nexiva Diffusics Catheter Stability Rev 1 (Extravasation) - 16 lipca 2012 r.; BD Protocol 11226 – Arcturus Cath Motion Test Report (Extravasation) - 20 września 2011 r.
- Maki DG, Ringer M. Risk factors for infusion-related phlebitis with small peripheral venous catheter. Annals of Internal Medicine. 1991;114:845-854.
- Bausone-Gazda D, Lefaiver CA, Walters SA. A randomized controlled trial to compare the complications of 2 peripheral intravenous catheter-stabilization systems. J Infus Nurs. 2010;33(6):371-384.)
- Gorski, L. A., Hadaway, L., Hagle, M. E., Broadhurst, D., Clare, S., Kleidon, T., Meyer, B. M., Nickel, B., Rowley, S., Sharpe, E., & Alexander, M. 2021, Infusion Therapy Standards of Practice, 8th Edition. Journal of Infusion Nursing. Section 6 (S108).
- Alexander M, Corrigan A. Gorski L, et al. Infusion nursing: an evidence based approach. 3rd ed. St. Louis, MO: Saunders Elsevier; 2010:410.
- O'Grady NP, Alexander M, Burns LA, et al. Guidelines for the prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections. CDC. 2011:16.
BD-37378 (09/2021)